Archive for the ‘Harkin’ Category

h1

Parkland, Florida

February 24, 2018

I have a very bad inclination about the shooting in Parkland, Florida. When it was reported that the assigned SRO deputy sheriff at the parkland school did not go into the school to confront the shooter, I marked it up as an oddity.

Since it was first reported regarding the first Broward County deputy sheriff not going into the school to confront the shooter, its been revealed that 3 more deputies also were on the school campus and failed to confront the active shooter who is known as Nicholas Cruz. To have 4 county deputies to fail to encounter and attempt to stop the active shooter has all the markings of a direct order from the top sheriff to stand down in the case of an active shooter at the school.

The deputies no doubt had a current picture of Nicholas Cruz with the understanding that he is not allowed on the campus or in the school. How was he able to get on the campus, let alone enter one of the school buildings with the 4 deputies on the campus that day. The only thing I can think of is a stand down order from the sherif. It would not surprise me, since I saw him on tv in last crime update notifying everybody that the active shooter had been identified and was in custody.

He has since become very political blaming the politicians on the failure of not banning certain weapons so that the parkland shooting would not have happened. The sheriffs department was notified 39 times or more about the danger Nicholas Cruz represents. I’m not saying that he issued a stand down order but the current investigation will reveal something to that effect.

Since 1999, the first school shooting at columbine, Co the Democratic Party could have demanded that schools are required to have armed security or somenting to that effect to protect the students in the schools. The. Only they have done is to make schools a weapons free zone essentially turning all schools into a shooting gallery for the like of people like Nicholas Cruz and those before him.

A sheriff is to be non-political but in the case of the Broward County sheriff he is completely political to the extreme left from what I saw and heard from him. His statement after Nicholas Cruz had been captured and in custody a day later was in his rush to blame the failure to ban weapons such as the AR-15 and not the failure of several city, state and federal agencies that knew of the danger Nicholas Cruz represented but failed in every way in stopping him.

No we have another 17 students killed by a person on multiple medications to deal with his depression and psychotic tendencies. At the prayer vigil house member Debbie washerman Schultz turned the candle light prayer vigil into a political revival like they did with the Paul Wellstone. As an adult house member Debbie washerman Schultz abused her position to turn a student led prayer vigil into a political statement.

The entire Democratic Party now sees the student led protest as another means to use to cripple the 2nd amendment. The grief the democratic politicians are showing are nothing more than acting skills they have acquired to show that they care. From 2009 to 2010 they had every chance to ban weapons and assault weapons but refused to do so.

I have the deepest sympathies for the students at the parkland school but banning weapons is not the answer but to make schools safe by providing teachers(in they want to be trained), janitors the one school employee that tends to fade into the walls and are forgotten by the students that they are even there to be trained in how to protect the students, getting retired veterans and even retired police to volunteer to protect schools.

The students should demand that their schools should be just as protected as the buildings are that the politicians work in, instead of declaring schools weapons free zones because that is where every shooting has occurred is on school grounds because there is nobody to shoot back at them, during the 3 minutes they are killing people.

h1

Net Neutrality The Fail

December 15, 2017

In 2015 the three FCC commissioners specifically selected by Obama stated that the Internet should be treated as a Utility, so the three sat down with the people from Google, FB, and Twitter and hammered out just how net neutrality would be applied and how it will work. Only problem was that it only affected companies that provided access to the internet such as verizon, comcast and AT&T as examples meaning they could not selectively slow down content. The Net Nuetrailty rules gave internet giant content providers the ability to decide what is considered free speech and what is deemed hate speech, the 2015 net nuetraility act was written with a huge influence by George Soros.

The past two years, I have seen content providers become the sole arbiters of what they deem is free speech and what is hate speech, my web blog was deemed hate speech because I freely give my opinions regardless who you are that will read my blogs, they are my opinions and nobody is forced to read them at all. FB enjoyed being the sole arbiter of free speech on their website, only problem was anyone who disagrees with FB’s political views is deemed a person with hate speech, their pages are blocked, suspended, and even canceled. YouTube is another content provider who extensively used net neutrality to block, defund and even cancel channels they deem not consistent with their political views, google is another content provider who did the same thing as FB, and YouTube.

The ruckus over ending net nuetrailty means that snowflakes and liberals can not silence those who disagree with their political views anymore, the way it was before 2015. What most liberals and snowflakes do not realize is that internet providers still slowed down you internet speed once you reached a certain level of data used, and it was perfectly legal to do so, because in the 2 year contracts people would agree to listed that the persons internet speed would be slowed down after using 10 gigs of data just as an example. Even telephone companies with non contract phones had the same detail as 2 year contracts. So in reality the only real thing about net nuetrailty was allowing left leaning corporations be the sole arbiters of what is deemed free speech and what they define as hate speech.

With the current FCC having three republican commissioners giving Obama’s net nuetrailty rules a total rebuke and handing oversight to the FTC, takes away the liberals and progressives the ability to control free speech. The internet has been around now for 28 years, prior to the net nuetrailty rules the internet ran perfectly without the governments heavy handed approach. When the internet took off in the 1990’s the Democratic Party wanted price controls over how much companies like AOL, compuserve, prodigy, and earthlink as examples could charge customers for internet access. My first year of having internet access my monthly charge was 70 a month for 100 hours of internet access each month. Today, I have a selection of tiers of internet speed and the prices reflect those speed levels. Either in January or February I will be getting gigabit internet access speed for 80 dollars a month, I am choosing the speed that best reflects my needs.

The internet has blossomed and exploded without any help or controls that the deomcratic Party feels is necessary, treating the internet as a utility gave the democrats the control over the internet they have so longed desired because it never discriminated who could access the internet, where as the democrats want to silience free speech unless you agree with their political views.

For 25 years the internet operated just fine without strict heavy handed government controls. For the past two years, the internet was under free speech attack if you disagreed with the content providers political views, such as disagreeing with abortion as just one example. Roe V Wade was a Supreme Court decision in the 1970’s but there was a demcocrat actually implying that without net neutrality a lady would not be able to look up where to get an abortion, surprise net nuetrailty boils down to who decides what is free speech and what they deem as hate speech.

Democrats and progressives literally hate the head FCC comissioner Ajit Pai, who with the other two FCC memebers wrote the rules repealing net nuetrailty and giving freedom back to the people who use the internet without fear of being labeled hate speech writer, homophobic, islamphobic as just a few examples. If you disagree with liberals, democrats and progressives, you are a unredeemable deplorable person.

Once again this blog is my opinion…….