Archive for the ‘Infidels’ Category

h1

California

May 1, 2016

I am not surprised that the media is all agog in regards to the illegals rioting in Costa Mesa all because Donald Trump went to speak and exercise his right to freedom of speech.  Because the illegals disagree with his speeches they have the right to riot and destroy public and private property in Costa Mesa.

Freedom of speech is for everyone as long as you are a progressive, liberal, democrat, socialist, and or illegals.  If you are a conservative in anyway form or fashion your right of free speech or the right to gather or assemble for meetings and or conventions of any kind that is never to be tolerated.  Proof is in the media and they are glorifying the rioting and blaming trump for his speeches, for the cause of the riots.

If a republican or conservative disagrees with a democrat, liberal and or progressive they are considered to racist, homophobic, religion hating, and gender hating.  If a conservative disagrees with Obama regarding his politics that person is considered 100% racist.

I do not feel that a person breaking our nations laws by entering this nation illegally should not be rewarded and we need to get rid of the notion that if you are an illegal and your baby is born an American citizen, that was already decided by the Supreme Court that citizenship is passed onto your children only if one or both parents are already citizens of the United States.

The illegals should be arrested for making threats against legal citizens and legal immigrants who wish to have legal political rallies that the illegals disagree with so they have threatened to use violent demonstrations and rioting to disrupt all and any rallies for Donald Trump.  What’s fascinating is you do not see republican or conservative to even libertarians using violence at any Hillary or Bernie political rallies.

Hillary and Bernie are both accomplices to those who are using violence and riots because they disagree with what Trump is saying in his political speeches.  So if you disagree with Trump it is okay to destroy both public and private property because you do not hear or see either Hillary or Bernie asking their followers to stop the rioting it’s more of a wink and nod to those who riot.

Just because Trump is making speeches that people disagree with that does not give them the right to riot in the first place.  Demonstrate peacefully to get your point across, is more effective than rioting, Dr. Martin Luther King had the right approach. Demonstrate peacefully and let the other side commit the violence, during the civil rights marches you had the democrats fighting back with the police and national guard against peaceful demonstrators.  Dr. Martin Luther King had all peace marchers sign pledge cards not to respond with violence no matter what happens.

It’s time for those that are here illegally to go home demonstrate against their own governments, instead of demanding the right to vote and live in a country where they are living illegally.

Advertisements
h1

Clinton & Obama

March 26, 2016

I have tried not to compare or draw conclusions regarding Obama severe defencies as President of the United States but it is becoming very alarming. Obama is following in the footsteps of Clinton when it comes to dealing with enemies of our nation and dealing with terrorism in general. Clinton saw no problems with innocent civilians getting killed in response to his orders of taking out al Qaeda top members with drone killing, Obama is following the same footsteps in dealing with ISIS, aka ISIL and refusing to call them Muslim fundelmentalist followers of the Quran instead the winks and nods by calling them radicalized which in fact they are not.

Andrew C McCarthy, was the attorney that prosecuted the blind sheik(Omar Abdel Rahman) and eleven other jihadists. To fully understand the persons that he was prosecuting he read the entire Quran, and asked for advice on certain passages and came to conclusion that the blind sheik and the other eleven were not radical Muslims but devout followers of the faith.

For Obama to say that the Muslims that are killing innocent civilians and attacking places all over the world have been radicalized is a huge lie and a disservice to this nation. Those radicalized Muslims are just devout followers of the Quran and Islam.

When you have the holy leader of Iran calling for “Death To America”, and it’s being broadcasted on cable news and regular news, you have the news media complicit in not sayin the the holy leader of Iran is radicalized when they know in fact that is what a devout Muslim follower of Islam really would say.

First it was Carter during his presidency, his idea of getting the American held hostage by a nation of devout followers of Islam to apply sanctions to hurt the new leaders of Iran. Carters idea was flawed from the onset, the leaders of Iran never suffered just the general population of Iran did. The new leaders used the sanctions to whip up hatred for America.  The talks never materialized during carters presidency, Carter thought using the carrot stick approach that the hostages would be released. Clinton used the same carrot stick approach in dealing with al quaeda by using jets and drones and he failed just as well.  I’m not sure but the phrase so as not to offend devout followers of Islam the term radicalized Muslims was coined sometime between 2001 and 2006. Obama is using the same carrot stick approach as Carter and Clinton had and you can see where it got them and it put the nation at risks for their liberal beliefs.

Obama uses the phrase so as to not offend Muslims, instead of radicalized Muslims he should be stating that it is devout followers of the Quran who are making bombs and killing innocent civilians because they see themselves in a holy war against all nonbelievers and we are the infidels according to the Quran.

I have read the Quran and I agree with Andrew C. McCarthy that they are not radicalized Muslims but devout followers of the Quran and call it a holy war against the infidels.