Archive for the ‘pro illegals’ Category

h1

Southern Poverty Law Center

August 26, 2017

After reading multiple websites and reading information on how the southern poverty law center came into being, I have come to the conclusion the real and true nature of the SPLC aka southern poverty law center real intentions are and what they do so as to keep the DNC and demcorats such as harry Reid and shummer and Nancy pelosi hands clean from contact but they are indirectly giving monies and blueprint on what to do each month.

The SPLC is the clearing house for information and directive control of the KKK, black lives matter movement, neo-nazis and the white supremacists by directing them where to demonstrate and to cause as much mayhem even violent acts to intimidate the elected GOP memebers in Congress. Every time the SPLC speak or issue a new map listing groups they disagree politically there is a demonstration planned knowing full well that violence will occur even some will be deadly expressly for that purpose at times.

Take Charlottesville as the most recent example of demonstrations and violence, first the person who filed the paperwork for the protest march is in fact one of the leaders that created the occupy Wall Street movement that failed. The ALT-right groups are actually groups created and funded by the SPLC and George Soros. The SPLC gives the groups their orders indirectly thru back channels.

The SPLC should be considered a home grown terrorist hate group because if you even disagree with any of their political views you are deemed full of hate and will be destroyed for not acknowledging that their way of thinking is the only what to think, any opposing views are not tolerated by the group. GuideStar what use too be a legit organization that listed charities that used most of the money they received for its purpose versus charities that had very high overhead costs.

The SPLC funnels money to the extremist groups so that they can continue to spread the hate of the left and the Democratic Party. It’s sad to note but nobody has taken the time to tie the SPLC to the attacks that the SPLC has sued and the number of cases they have won. It’s too convenient that to have such a nearly perfect case of winning suits in the manner they have goes against all probabilities. Yes the KKK did attack and burn down the original SPLC building but the coincidences to me are hard to ignore, since the SPLC pays the KKK and other extremist groups. These are just my opinions but somebody needs to investigate the real nature and purpose of the SPLC.

The SPLC does not allow opinions differing from theirs if you do you are a racist, a homophobe, misogynist, anything to intimidate a person to back down from their personal beliefs. I know that I will be attacked because of this post but what can they do, when they malign people and groups already for not accepting only their view of the world. Currently the SPLC is attacking President Trump for the pardon of former sheriff Arpiao of Arizona based on a falsehood they wish to perpetrate upon the American citizens.

First and foremost illegal immigrants do not have they same civil rights as American citizens and LEGAL immigrants have, illegal immigrants are granted the most basic rights which are to be treated fairly when arrested, and basic medical needs or food. ILLEGAL immigrants are not entitled to a free education, citizenship does not happen if you are born here unless one parent is already an American citizen, so there is no such thing as anchor babies to begin with, as the SPLC wants people to believe.

Checking a persons immigration status is not illegal to do, only when obama was in office, La Raza and the SPLC are assisting the Democratic Party in creating the next voting block of American citizens who in fact would really become 2nd class citizen with no opportunity to advance or get an education to help them achieve independence from govt handouts. The democrats see the ILLEGAL immigrants only purpose is to keep them in power politically.

The SPLC and La Raza put the rights of ILLEGALs higher than the civil rights of American citizens and LEGAL immigrants. If you are in America illegally then you only have basic rights and nothing more, American citizens and LEGAL immigrants have the same basic civil rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution where as ILLEGALs only have basic rights that are less than American civil rights.

I stated before it’s time someone really investigated the SPLC and its ties to the groups that protest and violently demonstrate. There are no conservative groups or individuals that give money to groups such as the KKK ever. The media should also be included in being investigated for helping assist the SPLC.

This post is just my opinion, but if someone wants to do the investigating, I say go for it one hundred percent.

Advertisements
h1

San Jose, CA

June 5, 2016

Why did the mayor of San Jose order the chief of police to stand down and let Trump rally attendees be assaulted by practicing a guaranteed civil right of association without fear or intimidation.

We all know the mayor supports Hillary but why is he taking away the rights of others because he disagrees with who the speaker was, because he was paid by Clinton and George Soros is my assumption, if they can imply people will be assaulted just for listening to Trump speak. Clinton and George Soros will win by taking the civil rights away of those who disagree with Clinton.

The clintons next move will be to employee the new black panthers and arm them with billy clubs. Freedom of association is in danger by Hillary Clinton.

h1

California

May 1, 2016

I am not surprised that the media is all agog in regards to the illegals rioting in Costa Mesa all because Donald Trump went to speak and exercise his right to freedom of speech.  Because the illegals disagree with his speeches they have the right to riot and destroy public and private property in Costa Mesa.

Freedom of speech is for everyone as long as you are a progressive, liberal, democrat, socialist, and or illegals.  If you are a conservative in anyway form or fashion your right of free speech or the right to gather or assemble for meetings and or conventions of any kind that is never to be tolerated.  Proof is in the media and they are glorifying the rioting and blaming trump for his speeches, for the cause of the riots.

If a republican or conservative disagrees with a democrat, liberal and or progressive they are considered to racist, homophobic, religion hating, and gender hating.  If a conservative disagrees with Obama regarding his politics that person is considered 100% racist.

I do not feel that a person breaking our nations laws by entering this nation illegally should not be rewarded and we need to get rid of the notion that if you are an illegal and your baby is born an American citizen, that was already decided by the Supreme Court that citizenship is passed onto your children only if one or both parents are already citizens of the United States.

The illegals should be arrested for making threats against legal citizens and legal immigrants who wish to have legal political rallies that the illegals disagree with so they have threatened to use violent demonstrations and rioting to disrupt all and any rallies for Donald Trump.  What’s fascinating is you do not see republican or conservative to even libertarians using violence at any Hillary or Bernie political rallies.

Hillary and Bernie are both accomplices to those who are using violence and riots because they disagree with what Trump is saying in his political speeches.  So if you disagree with Trump it is okay to destroy both public and private property because you do not hear or see either Hillary or Bernie asking their followers to stop the rioting it’s more of a wink and nod to those who riot.

Just because Trump is making speeches that people disagree with that does not give them the right to riot in the first place.  Demonstrate peacefully to get your point across, is more effective than rioting, Dr. Martin Luther King had the right approach. Demonstrate peacefully and let the other side commit the violence, during the civil rights marches you had the democrats fighting back with the police and national guard against peaceful demonstrators.  Dr. Martin Luther King had all peace marchers sign pledge cards not to respond with violence no matter what happens.

It’s time for those that are here illegally to go home demonstrate against their own governments, instead of demanding the right to vote and live in a country where they are living illegally.

h1

Joe Biden, Idiot Or Just Ignorant

February 25, 2015

Joe Biden, MOST incompetent vice president even more so than Al Gore, he stated in a speech that the govt must emancipate the peoples wealth, just as the democrats emancipated the slaves during the Civil War.

Last time I checked My history it was President Abrahman Lincoln who by presidential decree freed ended slavery while the democrats have done everything under the sun to bring back slavery and they have succeeded beyond theuir imagination by creating the economic slavery plantation.

They have another entire generation thinking that what the govt gives out is totally free such as the following

rental assistance

Medical coverage – subsidies – obamacare –

school: from kindergarten to college now

cars: cash for clunkers

Houses: Community Reinvestment Act: created the savings and loan scandal of the 1980’s, created the housing bubble in 2008, soon will cause another housing bubble again under new rules applied by congress in 2009.

credit scores: 2009 banking reform law: if your credit score is over 650 anytime you check it or it is checked then upto 10 points are taken and given to people with low credit scores

unempolyment benefits: no cut off or deadlines

welfare: all progress has been reversed from the welfare reform act of the 1990’s

Jobs: instead of working one fulltime job you will now need to work 2 jobs because employers are keeping the hours to under 30 hours to escape the penalty under obamacare.

Biden was talking about the 1% holding all the wealth but that is just smoke and mirrors, the democrats true target is the middle class because that is the segment of the population where the total wealth could run the federal govt for years.  Every action the democrats have passed into law has hurt the middle class and the poor making them more relient upon the federal govt.

The democrats  never emancipate anything or anyone, they just ENSLAVE them deeper to the federal govt.

Biden let the cat out of the bag by telling us that the democrats are going after the middle class wealth….

Just remember the DEMOCRATS have always been the party of slavery, they provoked a civil war to keep slavery….

h1

ObamaCare The Law That Is Racist

October 13, 2013

I woke up sometime during the night because mother nature has deemed me old enough to have a time clock alarm in my bladder thank you mother nature.

The title says it all and I wrote down what it means and by federal law this program must end……….

The Affordable Patient Health Care Act aka obamacare comes right to the point of being racist and discriminatory in the same breath first time that congress has allowed and even voted on a bill that lets the federal govt to use discrimination and be racist legally at the same time.

This law discriminates against you because of your age!

This law discriminates against you because of your sexual preference!

This law discriminates against you based on your skin color!

This law discriminates against you because of your gender as well!

This law discriminates against you if you are not muslim!

This Law also discriminates against couples who are married………..

talking about racism this law was written and aimed at illegals to begin with because the democratic party needs a new group to enslave and they will be worshiped for it.

If you are an American Citizen already you are punished by the law….

Exceptions to this are in you are black, gay, lesbian, perpetual pro amnesty, muslim, pro baby death (planned parenthood actually admitted they are for this), if you are getting govt subsidies and are willing to live according to the rules that the federal govt sets forth for you to live on govt handouts then you will not be punished by the law.

Soon this law will encumber if a person will be selected by the govt to go onto a college education provided by the state, The U.K. is a great example of how the govt selects who gets into college.

Prove me wrong with verifiable proof that obamacare is not based on racism and discriminatory acts built into the law by the democratic party

This law also does what the democrats have been trying to do by re-enslaving the very people who were freed by President Abraham Lincoln, plus it shreds the constitution by letting the HHS Dept do what

they have been unable to do and that is bypass the constitution and the rule of law………….

h1

The Real Truth Is Exposed About The Housing Bubble!!!!

November 5, 2011

This ties the C.R.A. bill signed into law in 1976, bill clintons secret commission that found their

findings on false information and used the findings as a loaded gun to the banking, savings and loans

and the mortgage companies.  It is these two actions that created and caused the abuses and the

economy that we have today, it can be laid at the feet of the Democrats and obama is taking it even

more to the left of the left…………

Smoking-Gun Document Ties Policy To Housing Crisis

By PAUL SPERRY, FOR INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY Posted 10/31/2011 08:05 AM ET

 View Enlarged Image

President Obama says the Occupy Wall Street protests show a “broad-based frustration” among Americans with the financial sector, which continues to kick against regulatory reforms three years after the financial crisis.

“You’re seeing some of the same folks who acted irresponsibly trying to fight efforts to crack down on the abusive practices that got us into this in the first place,” he complained earlier this month.

But what if government encouraged, even invented, those “abusive practices”?

Rewind to 1994. That year, the federal government declared war on an enemy — the racist lender — who officials claimed was to blame for differences in homeownership rate, and launched what would prove the costliest social crusade in U.S. history.

At President Clinton’s direction, no fewer than 10 federal agencies issued a chilling ultimatum to banks and mortgage lenders to ease credit for lower-income minorities or face investigations for lending discrimination and suffer the related adverse publicity. They also were threatened with denial of access to the all-important secondary mortgage market and stiff fines, along with other penalties.

Bubble? Regulators Blew It

The threat was codified in a 20-page “Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending” and entered into the Federal Register on April 15, 1994, by the Interagency Task Force on Fair Lending. Clinton set up the little-known body to coordinate an unprecedented crackdown on alleged bank redlining.

The edict — completely overlooked by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission and the mainstream media — was signed by then-HUD Secretary Henry Cisneros, Attorney General Janet Reno, Comptroller of the Currency Eugene Ludwig and Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, along with the heads of six other financial regulatory agencies.

“The agencies will not tolerate lending discrimination in any form,” the document warned financial institutions.

Ludwig at the time stated the ruling would be used by the agen cies as a fair-lending enforcement “tool,” and would apply to “all lenders” — including banks and thrifts, credit unions, mortgage brokers and finance companies.

The unusual full-court press was predicated on a Boston Fed study showing mortgage lenders rejecting blacks and Hispanics in greater proportion than whites. The author of the 1992 study, hired by the Clinton White House, claimed it was racial “discrimination.” But it was simply good underwriting.

It took private analysts, as well as at least one FDIC economist, little time to determine the Boston Fed study was terminally flawed. In addition to finding embarrassing mistakes in the data, they concluded that more relevant measures of a borrower’s credit history — such as past delinquencies and whether the borrower met lenders credit standards — explained the gap in lending between whites and blacks, who on average had poorer credit and higher defaults.

The study did not take into account a host of other relevant data factoring into denials, including applicants’ net worth, debt burden and employment record. Other variables, such as the size of down payments and the amount of the loans sought to the value of the property being bought, also were left out of the analysis. It also failed to consider whether the borrower submitted information that could not be verified, the presence of a cosigner and even the loan amount.

When these missing data were factored in, it became clear that the rejection rates were based on legitimate business decisions, not racism.

Still, the study was used to support a wholesale abandonment of traditional underwriting standards — the root cause of the mortgage crisis.

For the first time, Washington’s bank regulators put racial lending at the top of their checklist. Banks that failed to throw open their lending windows to credit-poor minorities were denied expansion plans by the Fed in an era of frenzied financial mergers and acquisitions. HUD threatened to deny them access to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which it controlled. And the Justice Department sued them for lending discrimination and branded them as racists in the press.

“HUD is authorized to direct Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to undertake various remedial actions, including suspension, probation, reprimand or settlement, against lenders found to have engaged in discriminatory lending practices,” the official policy statement warned.

The regulatory missive, which had the effect of law, advised lenders to bend “customary” underwriting standards for minority homebuyers with poor credit.

“Applying different lending standards to applicants who are members of a protected class is permissible,” it said. “In addition, providing different treatment to applicants to address past discrimination would be permissible.”

To that end, lenders were directed to “make changes in marketing strategy or loan products to better serve minority segments of the market.” They were also advised to “change commission structures” to encourage brokers and loan officers to “lend in minority and low-income neighborhoods” — a practice Countrywide Financial, the poster boy of the subprime scandal, perfected. The government now condemns the practice it once encouraged as “predatory.”

FDIC warned banks that even unintentional discrimination was against the law, and that they should be proactive in making “multicultural” loans. “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” the agency said in a separate advisory.

Confronted with the combined force of 10 federal regulators, lenders naturally toed the line, and were soon aggressively marketing subprime mortgages in urban areas. The marching orders threw such a scare into the industry that the American Bankers Association issued a “fair-lending tool kit” to every member. The Mortgage Bankers Association of America signed a “fair-lending” contract with HUD. So did Countrywide.

HUD also pushed Fannie and Freddie, which in effect set industry underwriting standards, to buy subprime mortgages, freeing lenders to originate even more high-risk loans.

“Lenders should ensure that their loan processors and underwriters are aware of the provisions of the secondary market guidelines that provide various alternative and flexible means by which applicants may demonstrate their ability and willingness to repay their loans,” the policy statement decreed.

“Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac not infrequently purchase mortgages exceeding the suggested ratios” of monthly housing expense to income (28%) and total obligations to income (36%).

It warned lenders who rejected minority applicants with high debt ratios and low credit scores to “be prepared” to prove to federal regulators and prosecutors they weren’t racist. “The Department of Justice is authorized to use the full range of its enforcement authority.”

It took a little more than a decade for the negative effects of the assault on prudent lending to be felt. By 2006, the shaky subprime mortgages began to default. In 2008, the bubble exploded.

Clinton’s task force survived the Bush administration, during which it produced fair-lending brochures in Spanish for immigrant home-loan applicants.

And it’s still alive today. Obama is building on the fair-lending infrastructure Clinton put in place.

As IBD first reported in July, Attorney General Eric Holder has launched a witch hunt vs. “racist” banks.

“It’s a more aggressive fair-lending enforcement approach now,” said Washington lawyer Andrew Sandler of Buckley Sandler LLP in a recent interview. “It is well beyond anything we saw during the Clinton administration.”

Tom Perez, assistant attorney general for civil rights, recently testified that his division “continues to participate in the federal Interagency Fair Lending Task Force.” And he and the task force are working with the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to “enhance fair-lending enforcement.”

The fair-lending task force’s original policy paper undercuts the notion the financial crisis was all about banker “greed,” though it certainly played a role after the fact. Rather, it offers compelling evidence that the crisis evolved chiefly from government mandates and threats to increase lending to applicants who could not afford them.

h1

THE REAL MESS

August 10, 2011

What many people do not know is the real history of the problems we are having today and it was signed into law by jimmy (peanut farmer) carter in 1977 here’s the first link and on the right side is a map that the law was based out that is how the term red lining was created it was showing banks where the safe loans could be repaid and the red areas were showing much riskier areas.

Thus created the first banking crisis back in the late 1980’s the S&L’s debacle the community activists boycotted and attacked the S&L’s banks to charge them with red lining and deceit and deceptive loan process.  Because the S&L’s banks were receiving insurance money from the FDIC  that made the banks liable if they were ever sued in court.

Timeline of the Housing Crisis

 
These are the leading culprits who actually caused the subprime

mortgage collapse which then caused the current worldwide deep recession

1. Jimmy Carter pushed for and signed into law the
Community Reinvestment Act which forced banks to
lower their standards so that previously unqualified
people could get a mortgage.

2. Bill Clinton then doubled-down on the Community Reinvestment
Act and greatly lowered mortgage standards to
allow a lot more unqualified borrowers to get loans.

3. Bill Clinton’s Attorney General, Janet Reno, then intimidated
banks with threats of legal action if they
did not give loans to unqualified borrowers who
would not have the income to pay the loans back.

4. A member of the Clinton administration, Franklin Raines
was then put in charge of Fannie Mae by Bill Clinton. Fannie
Mae bought up a majority of the bad loans made by
banks to unqualified borrowers. Raines then falsified Fannie
Mae financial reports so he could collect bonuses
which totaled over $90 million for 5 years.

5. Senator Chris Dodd, head of the Senatorial Financial
Committee, suppressed efforts by President
George W. Bush and congressional Republicans to
rein in the corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
He got a very favorable loan by a bank associated
with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He got large political
campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac.

6. Barney Frank, head of the House of Representatives
Banking Committee, also suppressed efforts by President
George W. Bush and Congressional Republicans to
investigate corruption at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

7. Barack Obama, while he was an attorney, filed lawsuits
against banks on behalf of ACORN in order to
force banks to give loans to people who could not afford
to pay them back. Obama, while he was a U.S.
Senator, also suppressed efforts by President George
W. Bush and Republican Congressmen to investigate
and rein in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.