Posts Tagged ‘obama’

h1

Clinton & Obama

March 26, 2016

I have tried not to compare or draw conclusions regarding Obama severe defencies as President of the United States but it is becoming very alarming. Obama is following in the footsteps of Clinton when it comes to dealing with enemies of our nation and dealing with terrorism in general. Clinton saw no problems with innocent civilians getting killed in response to his orders of taking out al Qaeda top members with drone killing, Obama is following the same footsteps in dealing with ISIS, aka ISIL and refusing to call them Muslim fundelmentalist followers of the Quran instead the winks and nods by calling them radicalized which in fact they are not.

Andrew C McCarthy, was the attorney that prosecuted the blind sheik(Omar Abdel Rahman) and eleven other jihadists. To fully understand the persons that he was prosecuting he read the entire Quran, and asked for advice on certain passages and came to conclusion that the blind sheik and the other eleven were not radical Muslims but devout followers of the faith.

For Obama to say that the Muslims that are killing innocent civilians and attacking places all over the world have been radicalized is a huge lie and a disservice to this nation. Those radicalized Muslims are just devout followers of the Quran and Islam.

When you have the holy leader of Iran calling for “Death To America”, and it’s being broadcasted on cable news and regular news, you have the news media complicit in not sayin the the holy leader of Iran is radicalized when they know in fact that is what a devout Muslim follower of Islam really would say.

First it was Carter during his presidency, his idea of getting the American held hostage by a nation of devout followers of Islam to apply sanctions to hurt the new leaders of Iran. Carters idea was flawed from the onset, the leaders of Iran never suffered just the general population of Iran did. The new leaders used the sanctions to whip up hatred for America.  The talks never materialized during carters presidency, Carter thought using the carrot stick approach that the hostages would be released. Clinton used the same carrot stick approach in dealing with al quaeda by using jets and drones and he failed just as well.  I’m not sure but the phrase so as not to offend devout followers of Islam the term radicalized Muslims was coined sometime between 2001 and 2006. Obama is using the same carrot stick approach as Carter and Clinton had and you can see where it got them and it put the nation at risks for their liberal beliefs.

Obama uses the phrase so as to not offend Muslims, instead of radicalized Muslims he should be stating that it is devout followers of the Quran who are making bombs and killing innocent civilians because they see themselves in a holy war against all nonbelievers and we are the infidels according to the Quran.

I have read the Quran and I agree with Andrew C. McCarthy that they are not radicalized Muslims but devout followers of the Quran and call it a holy war against the infidels.

Advertisements
h1

The Media And The Democrats Lie Again

March 31, 2015

The latest attack on conservatism has been happening since the Governor of Indiana,
signed into law a bill that is nearly 100% identical to the bill that then president
bill clinton signed into law in 1993. The law that I am referring to is the Freedom Of Restoration Act that then president bill clinton signed into law and 25 other states had signed into law similar or identical to the federal law.

Here is a little bit of history on the bill that was signed into law by then president bill clinton, a group of native american indians were arrested and jailed for possession of peyote that they stated was for religious purposes. In 1993 when the democrats held congress and the presidency the bill Religious Of Freedom Restoration Act was passed with near 100% in the house and near 100% in the senate and bill clinton signing it into law.

Now that a Republican Governor and Republican legislature have passed the nearly identical Religious Freedom Restoration Act to the Federal version is to be deemed discriminatory against gays, lesbians, transgender but yet wont protest the same federal law that has been on the books since 1993. Here is the Federal Law Link, and Indiana’s law Link, as you can tell the laws are nearly identical the only issue is that a Republican Governor did the same thing that the democrats rushed to protect the use of peyote by native american indians.

Now that liberals are having to deal with the state of Indiana having the same law on their state law books, they had to come up with a farce of claiming discrimination and will not allow the truth to be known. The law has what is called the Sherbert Test which mandates strict scrutiny if a law has violated the freedom of religion in the 1st amendment.

liberals and democrats and the media hate that a state with a republican governor, and state controlled legislature are applying the same federal law and having it on the state law books. They now see this law only in one light and will not accept any other story line other than it is based on allowing sexual discrimination against gays and lesbians and transgendered.

Colorado does not have this law on their books and case in point is when a lesbian couple knowing full well that a specific bakery ran their bakery based on their religious beliefs. They went in and tried ordering a wedding cake knowing that they would be turned down for the cake only, for years they had been customers for other bakery items. The couple never turned them away from buying any of their products they only turned them down for the wedding cake based on their religious values and beliefs. They were put out of business by the lesbian couple complaining to the state for the bakeries discrimination against them based on sexual orientation.

This law in Indiana now has the state making sure that bills passed and signed into laws do not encroach on the first amendment of the Constitution. George Stephanopoulos on ABC tried to redirect the interview many times by implying that the law was blatantly discriminatory only against gays and lesbians. The Governor would have nothing to do with that tactic and kept on message and even educating George that the same law was passed by the democrats and signed into law by bill clinton in 1993.

The democrats passed the bill in 1993 and signed into law the same year praised it for being all inclusive. Now that the law is being used for practical reasons and it fits squarely into conservative views and values they are in a catatonic state of anger that their law is being used for good.

Bill Clinton signed the bill into law in 1993 and obama voted for a nearly identical bill in 1998, democrats hate when a law can be used by conservatives in the same manner to protect individuals and businesses

This Law means that the person or business is considered innocent until the state can find that a law was not burdensome on a person or business now……..As does the Federal Law…….

h1

islam

February 27, 2015

The religion of the uninformed, the mullahs prefer to have you only listen to their interpetations of the koran because the less a person knows leaves them with a greater power and control over the lives of the people who blieve in islam making them nothing more than sheep.  The mullahs tend to lead similar lives as did the drunk who created islam from a drunken binge.  The ayatollah of iran is just another drunk only in for the power and wealth over the masses, the people suffer while he and the mullahs live the life of the rich.

In the news are all the attacks and the taking of hostages of christians and we have an elected president who is more worried about offending a terroristic nation and the radical relgion he beleives in.  obama is the manchurian candidate in full bloom, he has bowed before lkes of his chineese Masters, he checked with his russian Master regarding the Ukraine and then proceeded to sell the people in that country right back into islamic communisn under putin the leader of russia…

Then we have his two stooges the current Secretary of State john kerry aka lurch saying before Congress that the american people are safer today than there were under the bush years, and you have hillary who wants to be president so bad that she will literally sell out this nation for a penny.  We used to have Presidents who stood up for the country and the people of this nation, now we have an elected president bent of wrecking the Nation by eliminating immigration laws and the borders of the United States.  All for what a religion that hates this nation and the religious freedoms we have.

The current president and sitting democrats in the senate are currently in the process of selling Israel out to islamic nations surrounding them, because Isreal has religious freedoms and that people are allowed to read the Torah without having it interpeted for them.  To show just how ignorant islam is they are currently destroying historical artifacts and religious statues because they prove that islam is a young relgion centuries younger than Judism and Christianity.

The democrats and the legacy media embrace islam like lost lovers, the contradictions are amazing….

h1

Obama And Living On 15,000 A Year

January 22, 2015

In obama’s state of the union speech he dared congress to live on minimum wage for a year aka 15,000 a year

only one problem in his poorly written speech, regarding the total yearly income.  obama forgot that each state has

income taxes or none at all.  in states like New York and California  an individual will pay total taxes including federal

taxes.nearly 55% of their income (all federal income taxes, obamacare taxes, state taxes, county taxes, city taxes, sales

taxes, gas taxes, (some states the sugar tax), cigarette tax, property taxes(these pay for fire, police, school, infrastructure city

government, county government, roads) , (some states driving on the road tax), utility taxes(water, gas,land line phone, and

cell phone), prescription taxes, doctors office visits.

So basically a single person tries to live on 7,500 or less a year, and that barely gives the single person a chance to actually

live. From the number of federal programs that could be cut is outrageous, there are almost 50 or more federal jobs training

programs that overlap or duplicate older programs that are just as effective, you could cut 39 to 41 programs and nobody

would notice except for the federal employees union would.

I was living in a state that was taking the same as federal income taxes each month because I was single and making over

31,000 a year, I was placed into the top 10% income earners tax bracket all because I had no dependents and no

deductions. Total taxes that I was paying each month was 1600, I was paying 61% of my income in total taxes…….

I am now  living in a state to where I am able to start saving for my retirement, and start investing my spare money that that

it will help with my retirement when I do retire.

We have a federal government that uses what is called base line budgeting that builds in a 10% budget increase for the

next federal budget and when congress gives itself a pat on the back for cutting the federal budget all they are cutting is just

the pace of the increase, not actually cutting the budget. Under the years of Sequester the budget that was used the

federal budget 2007, less than 10 pennies on 100 dollars was lost on each federal agency budget…….

Obama dares congress to live on 15 grand a year, when all the vacations that he has taken is over 44 million dollars,

compared to George W, Bush his vacations cost the tax payers 4 million total…………

Talk about not walking the talk, he challenges others but wont do it himself, he was born with a a silver spoon in his mouth

and expects others to pay for his life style.

I challenge obama himself to live on 15 grand and nothing else pay for his gas when local in D.C., live on bag lunches and

eat ramen noodles 3 to 5 nights a week…….and live on peanut butter toast during the mornings and powdered milk and no

govt programs……….

But like all democrats they are all show and emotions but no substance or ideas to actually solve a problem….

h1

Religion

January 8, 2015

I find it fascinating that relgion plays an important part if the majority of peoples lives, some take a slacker approach to their religion and then you have the extremists approach.

The Jewish faith was founded on trust in a higher power, and to follow the commandments privately not

publicly to call attention to yourself, to defend your faith when challlenged and help defend your fellow

believers when attacked.  You are encouraged to read the torah and for the most part the religious

interpetation has been consistently the same

The Catholic faith was the belief that Gods son was crucified to forgive the sins of our ancestors and a

renewal of the commandments and Gods word on saving those who believe in him. The religious

interpretations have been the same as well, but there were the centuries that the royal houses of europe

were using the catholic faith as a vehicle to expand their kingdoms and using the catholic faith as a weapon

to force conversion or face death.  The Catholic faith has always been about non-violence but there have

been extremists who have twisted the faith into something it never was meant to be, as the royal houses of

europe had used it as a means to control the people until the church decided it was time to go back to its

origins of non-violence. Over the centuries the royal houses had selected who was pope by selecting who

became cardinals they intern owed their allegiance to the royalty not to the church.

Then we come to islam who was founded not by a prophet but a 40yo drunken male of arabic descent who

was envious of what others had.  muhammad had married a much older female who had riches where as he

had none.  islam is based on violence and the destruction of other relgions and the eradication of the jewish

people.  no where is it written that islam is non-violent, its all about convert or die by the sword.  they

consider pictures, drawings or cartoons of muhammad to be blaspheme of their relgion, get over it, your

following the writings of drunken man who envied what others had.  To put him on par with God is

blaspheme in itself, you are following the the writings of a 40 yo male who was a drunk, a pedophile, a rapist

and one who covets what others have.

I put islam on par with kwanzza a made up religion to deal with personal short comings of a failed man if he

could be called that.

h1

Internet…….

January 5, 2015

I was just reading an article on the FCC attempt to twist the rules to make the internet a utility, to make sure that

it can be regulated, for the benefit of the people who have been duped into living on the government economic plantation

where they believe the lies that they are fed that what the government gives them is 100% free.  As Rush Limbaugh put it best

they are low information voters who believe the lies they are fed.

A.T.& T., was broken up because of a true Monopoly regarding telecommunications both regional and long distance.  In

1984 A.T.& T. was broken up into 7 baby bells as 7 regional holding companies.  SBC and BellSouth create a joint venture

called Cingular Wireless in 1984, in 2004 Cingular acquires A.T.&T wireless and assumes the company name of A.T.&T.

Wireless..  SBC acquires A.T.& T Coporation in 2005  and renames itself A.T.&T. Inc, in 2006 A.T.&T. merges with BellSouth

Corporation to consolidate its control of Cingular and does the complete re-branding as A.T.&T.

The internet is not a needed utility because it is on literally everything from smart phones to tablets to laptops to desktop

computers.  If the FCC does deem the internet as a utility places that provide free wifi will end such offering, places like

shopping malls, mcdonalds, burger king, dennys, or any other establishments.  (the a fore mentioned establishments are

copy right protected and their names in this article are by no means my promoting them)

Currently Internet 2.0 is being tested over in Europe, if the FCC deems it a utility we will never see internet 2.0 ever here

in the States. The internet is not a need it does not provide lights or heat to survive it is just an extra want that provides fun,

entertainment, and contact with others all over the country that can be done thru a thing called letter writing and placing it in

the mail.  The current innovations that we currently have will be killed off or stifled by onerous regulations, it is because of

wireless technology that we have the advancement in computers, tablets, cell phones. We now have cellphones with

computing power that rivals that cray research computers in the1990’s.

The democrats see the internet as nothing more than another golden goose to transfer wealth, it will be another industry

that they wreck from the ground up, just like the latest is the health care industry they wrecked that by starting in the 1970’s.

The companies that are ISP (internet service providers), they provide the access to get onto the internet by creating and

building the necessary equipment and constant upgrades to said equipment and the democratic party now wants to own

those businesses.

I chose the speed and bandwidth of internet access I wanted freely, I do not need a nanny telling me what I should have

or have it controlled by an unelected board appointed by the Governor to the utility rates commission.

The internet is not and never has been a utility its been an extra want and should be just that, its practically free provided

by businesses who want you to shop and spend your money……

The internet is a great invention because it helps me to where I can pay all my bills online………

I will revisit this posting to add more as needed as to why the internet is not and never will be a utility……

h1

The Democrats Do It Again

November 20, 2014

Roughly 64 years ago, congress that was controlled by the democrats had control of all three branches, and passed legislation that encourarged employers to provide benefits over higher pay, to prevent inflation.

in the 1943 congress passed a bill and it was signed into law making employer proved benefits tax free, this was done to allegedly prevent inflation because employers were starting to pay higher wages.  The democrats in control of congress saw that with higher wages people would become more mobile as a society.  Contrary to popular democrat belief it was not the new deal that spurred the growth of the 1950’s but the pent up demand for new things that needed to be replaced.  The new deal extended the depression by taking capital out of the private sector, just as obamacare is taking capital out of the private sector today.

For the 60 plus years that congress was controlled by the democrats bills were passed into law to encourage the dependency of people to rely on the federal govt to provide for them.  From the late 1960’s thru to 1993, the democratic party had successfully brought back the plantation from the south.  Without a segment of society relying on the democrats to provide for them there is no reason for them to be around.

The democrats brought back the plantation but now its called the Economic Plantation with low information voters that keep electing them because they do not know better.

Now with the affodable patient care act being passed and signed into law in 2008 illegally based on how it was passed and written.  The democrats are now trying to undo all their work in creating employer provided health care benefits with the unions backing the creation of employer health insurance.

I find it ironic that a democrats are now trying to do away with employer provided health insurance in 2015, since they enforced employer health insurance to begin with as a means to prevent inflation that never would have happened.

Their actions once again prove that socialism fails.