Posts Tagged ‘Al Gore’

h1

Clinton & Obama

March 26, 2016

I have tried not to compare or draw conclusions regarding Obama severe defencies as President of the United States but it is becoming very alarming. Obama is following in the footsteps of Clinton when it comes to dealing with enemies of our nation and dealing with terrorism in general. Clinton saw no problems with innocent civilians getting killed in response to his orders of taking out al Qaeda top members with drone killing, Obama is following the same footsteps in dealing with ISIS, aka ISIL and refusing to call them Muslim fundelmentalist followers of the Quran instead the winks and nods by calling them radicalized which in fact they are not.

Andrew C McCarthy, was the attorney that prosecuted the blind sheik(Omar Abdel Rahman) and eleven other jihadists. To fully understand the persons that he was prosecuting he read the entire Quran, and asked for advice on certain passages and came to conclusion that the blind sheik and the other eleven were not radical Muslims but devout followers of the faith.

For Obama to say that the Muslims that are killing innocent civilians and attacking places all over the world have been radicalized is a huge lie and a disservice to this nation. Those radicalized Muslims are just devout followers of the Quran and Islam.

When you have the holy leader of Iran calling for “Death To America”, and it’s being broadcasted on cable news and regular news, you have the news media complicit in not sayin the the holy leader of Iran is radicalized when they know in fact that is what a devout Muslim follower of Islam really would say.

First it was Carter during his presidency, his idea of getting the American held hostage by a nation of devout followers of Islam to apply sanctions to hurt the new leaders of Iran. Carters idea was flawed from the onset, the leaders of Iran never suffered just the general population of Iran did. The new leaders used the sanctions to whip up hatred for America.  The talks never materialized during carters presidency, Carter thought using the carrot stick approach that the hostages would be released. Clinton used the same carrot stick approach in dealing with al quaeda by using jets and drones and he failed just as well.  I’m not sure but the phrase so as not to offend devout followers of Islam the term radicalized Muslims was coined sometime between 2001 and 2006. Obama is using the same carrot stick approach as Carter and Clinton had and you can see where it got them and it put the nation at risks for their liberal beliefs.

Obama uses the phrase so as to not offend Muslims, instead of radicalized Muslims he should be stating that it is devout followers of the Quran who are making bombs and killing innocent civilians because they see themselves in a holy war against all nonbelievers and we are the infidels according to the Quran.

I have read the Quran and I agree with Andrew C. McCarthy that they are not radicalized Muslims but devout followers of the Quran and call it a holy war against the infidels.

Advertisements
h1

The New World AKA America

June 30, 2015

Before America became its own nation in its own right, slavery was brought to the new world by the following nations

Portuguese, Great Britain, French, Spanish and the Dutch Empire.  The first blacks came to America as indentured

servants,but soon all pretense was ended when those 5 nations had established outposts along the coast of the African

Continent. Those five nations started buying African slaves from local African leaders that had captured in raids from other

African tribes.  The local leaders saw that selling the slaves into slavery and taken away from the African continent was far

better than to outright kill the captured slaves.  Between 1607 and 1732 with the establishment of the 13 colonies so had

slavery been established by the 5 nations and until 1776 when the 13 colonies declared its independence as a new nation

slavery had been in America for 169 years.  Slavery existed legally in the states for another 85 years with the federal govt

turning a blind eye to it because the federal govt benefited from the sale of slaves in the south, even sold slaves in the

south on federal ships.

America had been founded on Judeo-Christain beliefs that concept today annoys every single liberal to their bones. The

Constitution includes a clause that has the liberals more upset than anything else, it prohibits the federal govt from creating

or establishing a national religion.  The fact that this nation was founded on judeo-christain beliefs means that we can learn

from our past and accept our past to become a better nation.  For the past fifty years liberals have been getting a free ride

when it comes to the past, it was conservatives that opposed slavery and they were concentrated for the most part in the

northern states, where as the liberals were the ones who held onto the notion that slavery was legally and morally accepted

in the world at that time, but there was a growing movement to free all slaves in 1860, but before that had happened Lincoln

invaded confederate states to keep them from leaving the union because it was the money from the southern states that

paid to keep the federal govt in business. ( The above information can be found but it does take time because the liberals hate the truth so they bury it deep, very deep. )

Today’s culture is to rewrite history so that the good history is removed and only the bad and horrendous are only taught

because this country is not exceptional because of how the nation was founded.  The liberals do not want the education of

the country has actually inspired other nations to expand the freedoms that they did not have prior to the formation of this

nation.  The founding Fathers decided it was the people who granted the govt. the powers to govern not the other way

around where the govt. ruled by decree and decided what rights the people were allowed.  In 1788 George Washington ran

for President against John Adams, Washington received the most electoral college votes, John Adams became George

Washington’s Vice President  under the rules of election in the constitution. George Washington served two terms until 1797

when John Adams was elected the 2nd President of the United States and the first ever peaceful hand over of power to

govern a nation.

This nation has given more opportunities to minorities to succeed than any other nation before, most of our amendments to

the constitution has some basis of the ten commandments in them, that is another reason why the democrats and the

liberals hate the country and the constitution.

I will be posting more to this as I read more about the history on this nation, that is the truth and not rewritten history  to

reflect how bad this nation is according to everything obama and the democrats and the tv media proclaims it to be.

h1

Obama Lies Again

May 2, 2015

Since 1949, the federal government has spent nearly 495 billion dollars just on urban renewal in the cities across the

United States.  Over 300,000 communities have been ruined under the guise of urban renewal since 2010 the government

spends 9 billion on housing subsidies since 2000 on structures that are substandard and the federal herded U.S. citizens

into them knowing just how substandard the buildings are.  H.U.D., has been racked with scandal after scandal since its

inception from H.U.D. officials grafting and skimming the federal budget.  H.U.D., has been spending over 27 billion since

2000 on rental subsidies, scandals. The democrats have been using H.U.D. as a vehicle to get rich, the republican officials

have as well but but the democrats have had over 40 years experience in using federal agencies to enrich themselves.

States and cities that have been decimated by the democratic party used grants from H.U.D. under the guise of urban

renewal have ruined  neighborhoods thru the guise of a better city.  They raze perfectly good neighborhoods thru eminent

domain for the good of the city or state.  The cities have used eminent domain to line their pockets and take land away from

law abiding citizen in favor of high density living.which is proving to be just another boondoggle along with light rail transit

and heavy rail transit just another H.U.D. program under the guise of urban renewal.

On April 29th 2015 obama literally lied that the G.O.P. led house and senate have not spent enough on urban renewal,

since the current H.U.D. budget was agreed to last year and runs until august 2015 which is 45.5 billion this fiscal year.

H.U.D.s urban renewal program has ruined Baltimore more than it has helped, there are between 47 and 49 federal jobs

training centers in Baltimore which really are nothing but black holes for wasting federal monies.  The State of Maryland

income tax rate is average 5%.  The City of Baltimore taxes residents at 3.05%, if the democrats were serious about helping

the poor they would actually cut federal spending so that two parent families are not having to work just to live paycheck to

paycheck because of the every expanding federal spending budget.  Baltimore is having to repay 4 million is misspent

H.U.D. funding they must repay the funds from this years funding.

So when obama speaks just remember if he was Pinocchio his nose would stretch across America….

h1

The Media And The Democrats Lie Again

March 31, 2015

The latest attack on conservatism has been happening since the Governor of Indiana,
signed into law a bill that is nearly 100% identical to the bill that then president
bill clinton signed into law in 1993. The law that I am referring to is the Freedom Of Restoration Act that then president bill clinton signed into law and 25 other states had signed into law similar or identical to the federal law.

Here is a little bit of history on the bill that was signed into law by then president bill clinton, a group of native american indians were arrested and jailed for possession of peyote that they stated was for religious purposes. In 1993 when the democrats held congress and the presidency the bill Religious Of Freedom Restoration Act was passed with near 100% in the house and near 100% in the senate and bill clinton signing it into law.

Now that a Republican Governor and Republican legislature have passed the nearly identical Religious Freedom Restoration Act to the Federal version is to be deemed discriminatory against gays, lesbians, transgender but yet wont protest the same federal law that has been on the books since 1993. Here is the Federal Law Link, and Indiana’s law Link, as you can tell the laws are nearly identical the only issue is that a Republican Governor did the same thing that the democrats rushed to protect the use of peyote by native american indians.

Now that liberals are having to deal with the state of Indiana having the same law on their state law books, they had to come up with a farce of claiming discrimination and will not allow the truth to be known. The law has what is called the Sherbert Test which mandates strict scrutiny if a law has violated the freedom of religion in the 1st amendment.

liberals and democrats and the media hate that a state with a republican governor, and state controlled legislature are applying the same federal law and having it on the state law books. They now see this law only in one light and will not accept any other story line other than it is based on allowing sexual discrimination against gays and lesbians and transgendered.

Colorado does not have this law on their books and case in point is when a lesbian couple knowing full well that a specific bakery ran their bakery based on their religious beliefs. They went in and tried ordering a wedding cake knowing that they would be turned down for the cake only, for years they had been customers for other bakery items. The couple never turned them away from buying any of their products they only turned them down for the wedding cake based on their religious values and beliefs. They were put out of business by the lesbian couple complaining to the state for the bakeries discrimination against them based on sexual orientation.

This law in Indiana now has the state making sure that bills passed and signed into laws do not encroach on the first amendment of the Constitution. George Stephanopoulos on ABC tried to redirect the interview many times by implying that the law was blatantly discriminatory only against gays and lesbians. The Governor would have nothing to do with that tactic and kept on message and even educating George that the same law was passed by the democrats and signed into law by bill clinton in 1993.

The democrats passed the bill in 1993 and signed into law the same year praised it for being all inclusive. Now that the law is being used for practical reasons and it fits squarely into conservative views and values they are in a catatonic state of anger that their law is being used for good.

Bill Clinton signed the bill into law in 1993 and obama voted for a nearly identical bill in 1998, democrats hate when a law can be used by conservatives in the same manner to protect individuals and businesses

This Law means that the person or business is considered innocent until the state can find that a law was not burdensome on a person or business now……..As does the Federal Law…….

h1

Obama And Living On 15,000 A Year

January 22, 2015

In obama’s state of the union speech he dared congress to live on minimum wage for a year aka 15,000 a year

only one problem in his poorly written speech, regarding the total yearly income.  obama forgot that each state has

income taxes or none at all.  in states like New York and California  an individual will pay total taxes including federal

taxes.nearly 55% of their income (all federal income taxes, obamacare taxes, state taxes, county taxes, city taxes, sales

taxes, gas taxes, (some states the sugar tax), cigarette tax, property taxes(these pay for fire, police, school, infrastructure city

government, county government, roads) , (some states driving on the road tax), utility taxes(water, gas,land line phone, and

cell phone), prescription taxes, doctors office visits.

So basically a single person tries to live on 7,500 or less a year, and that barely gives the single person a chance to actually

live. From the number of federal programs that could be cut is outrageous, there are almost 50 or more federal jobs training

programs that overlap or duplicate older programs that are just as effective, you could cut 39 to 41 programs and nobody

would notice except for the federal employees union would.

I was living in a state that was taking the same as federal income taxes each month because I was single and making over

31,000 a year, I was placed into the top 10% income earners tax bracket all because I had no dependents and no

deductions. Total taxes that I was paying each month was 1600, I was paying 61% of my income in total taxes…….

I am now  living in a state to where I am able to start saving for my retirement, and start investing my spare money that that

it will help with my retirement when I do retire.

We have a federal government that uses what is called base line budgeting that builds in a 10% budget increase for the

next federal budget and when congress gives itself a pat on the back for cutting the federal budget all they are cutting is just

the pace of the increase, not actually cutting the budget. Under the years of Sequester the budget that was used the

federal budget 2007, less than 10 pennies on 100 dollars was lost on each federal agency budget…….

Obama dares congress to live on 15 grand a year, when all the vacations that he has taken is over 44 million dollars,

compared to George W, Bush his vacations cost the tax payers 4 million total…………

Talk about not walking the talk, he challenges others but wont do it himself, he was born with a a silver spoon in his mouth

and expects others to pay for his life style.

I challenge obama himself to live on 15 grand and nothing else pay for his gas when local in D.C., live on bag lunches and

eat ramen noodles 3 to 5 nights a week…….and live on peanut butter toast during the mornings and powdered milk and no

govt programs……….

But like all democrats they are all show and emotions but no substance or ideas to actually solve a problem….

h1

Global Warming Is a Failed Theory

June 14, 2008

This is a post by the Founder of the Weather Channel and his research proves Global warming is not true

Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas
by John Coleman

You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global Warming and four dollar a gallon gas. It is shocking, but true, to learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the environmentalist’s attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline. All this big time science, international meetings, thick research papers, dire threats for the future; all of it, comes down to their claim that the carbon dioxide in the exhaust from your car and in the smoke stacks from our power plants is destroying the climate of planet Earth. What an amazing fraud; what a scam.

The future of our civilization lies in the balance.

That’s the battle cry of the High Priest of Global Warming Al Gore and his fellow, agenda driven disciples as they predict a calamitous outcome from anthropogenic global warming. According to Mr. Gore the polar ice caps will collapse and melt and sea levels will rise 20 feet inundating the coastal cities making 100 million of us refugees. Vice President Gore tells us numerous Pacific islands will be totally submerged and uninhabitable. He tells us global warming will disrupt the circulation of the ocean waters, dramatically changing climates, throwing the world food supply into chaos. He tells us global warming will turn hurricanes into super storms, produce droughts, wipe out the polar bears and result in bleaching of coral reefs. He tells us tropical diseases will spread to mid latitudes and heat waves will kill tens of thousands. He preaches to us that we must change our lives and eliminate fossil fuels or face the dire consequences. The future of our civilization is in the balance.

With a preacher’s zeal, Mr. Gore sets out to strike terror into us and our children and make us feel we are all complicit in the potential demise of the planet.

Here is my rebuttal.

There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed. But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.

Through all history, Earth has shifted between two basic climate regimes: ice ages and what paleoclimatologists call “Interglacial periods”. For the past 10 thousand years the Earth has been in an interglacial period. That might well be called nature’s global warming because what happens during an interglacial period is the Earth warms up, the glaciers melt and life flourishes. Clearly from our point of view, an interglacial period is greatly preferred to the deadly rigors of an ice age. Mr. Gore and his crowd would have us believe that the activities of man have overwhelmed nature during this interglacial period and are producing an unprecedented, out of control warming.

Well, it is simply not happening. Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years. So, I ask Al Gore, where’s the global warming?

The cooling trend is so strong that recently the head of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had to acknowledge it. He speculated that nature has temporarily overwhelmed mankind’s warming and it may be ten years or so before the warming returns. Oh, really. We are supposed to be in a panic about man-made global warming and the whole thing takes a ten year break because of the lack of Sun spots. If this weren’t so serious, it would be laughable.

Now allow me to talk a little about the science behind the global warming frenzy. I have dug through thousands of pages of research papers, including the voluminous documents published by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I have worked my way through complicated math and complex theories. Here’s the bottom line: the entire global warming scientific case is based on the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the use of fossil fuels. They don’t have any other issue. Carbon Dioxide, that’s it.

Hello Al Gore; Hello UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Your science is flawed; your hypothesis is wrong; your data is manipulated. And, may I add, your scare tactics are deplorable. The Earth does not have a fever. Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming.

The focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide grew out a study by Roger Revelle who was an esteemed scientist at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute. He took his research with him when he moved to Harvard and allowed his students to help him process the data for his paper. One of those students was Al Gore. That is where Gore got caught up in this global warming frenzy. Revelle’s paper linked the increases in carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere with warming. It labeled CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve. When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son David, also at Scripps, took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20 percent.

All the computer models, all of the other findings, all of the other angles of study, all come back to and are based on CO2 as a significant greenhouse gas. It is not.

Here is the deal about CO2, carbon dioxide. It is a natural component of our atmosphere. It has been there since time began. It is absorbed and emitted by the oceans. It is used by every living plant to trigger photosynthesis. Nothing would be green without it. And we humans; we create it. Every time we breathe out, we emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It is not a pollutant. It is not smog. It is a naturally occurring invisible gas.

Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38 are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t.

The UN IPCC has attracted billions of dollars for the research to try to make the case that CO2 is the culprit of run-away, man-made global warming. The scientists have come up with very complex creative theories and done elaborate calculations and run computer models they say prove those theories. They present us with a concept they call radiative forcing. The research organizations and scientists who are making a career out of this theory, keep cranking out the research papers. Then the IPCC puts on big conferences at exotic places, such as the recent conference in Bali. The scientists endorse each other’s papers, they are summarized and voted on, and viola, we are told global warming is going to kill us all unless we stop burning fossil fuels.

May I stop here for a few historical notes? First, the internal combustion engine and gasoline were awful polluters when they were first invented. And, both gasoline and automobile engines continued to leave a layer of smog behind right up through the 1960’s. Then science and engineering came to the environmental rescue. Better exhaust and ignition systems, catalytic converters, fuel injectors, better engineering throughout the engine and reformulated gasoline have all contributed to a huge reduction in the exhaust emissions from today’s cars. Their goal then was to only exhaust carbon dioxide and water vapor, two gases widely accepted as natural and totally harmless. Anyone old enough to remember the pall of smog that used to hang over all our cities knows how much improvement there has been. So the environmentalists, in their battle against fossil fuels and automobiles had a very good point forty years ago, but now they have to focus almost entirely on the once harmless carbon dioxide. And, that is the rub. Carbon dioxide is not an environmental problem; they just want you now to think it is.

Numerous independent research projects have been done about the greenhouse impact from increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. These studies have proven to my total satisfaction that CO2 is not creating a major greenhouse effect and is not causing an increase in temperatures. By the way, before his death, Roger Revelle coauthored a paper cautioning that CO2 and its greenhouse effect did not warrant extreme countermeasures.

So now it has come down to an intense campaign, orchestrated by environmentalists claiming that the burning of fossil fuels dooms the planet to run-away global warming. Ladies and Gentlemen, that is a myth.

So how has the entire global warming frenzy with all its predictions of dire consequences, become so widely believed, accepted and regarded as a real threat to planet Earth? That is the most amazing part of the story.

To start with global warming has the backing of the United Nations, a major world force. Second, it has the backing of a former Vice President and very popular political figure. Third it has the endorsement of Hollywood, and that’s enough for millions. And, fourth, the environmentalists love global warming. It is their tool to combat fossil fuels. So with the environmentalists, the UN, Gore and Hollywood touting Global Warming and predictions of doom and gloom, the media has scrambled with excitement to climb aboard. After all the media loves a crisis. From YK2 to killer bees the media just loves to tell us our lives are threatened. And the media is biased toward liberal, so it’s pre-programmed to support Al Gore and UN. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The LA Times, The Washington Post, the Associated Press and here in San Diego The Union Tribune are all constantly promoting the global warming crisis.

So who is going to go against all of that power? Not the politicians. So now the President of the United States, just about every Governor, most Senators and most Congress people, both of the major current candidates for President, most other elected officials on all levels of government are all riding the Al Gore Global Warming express. That is one crowded bus.

I suspect you haven’t heard it because the mass media did not report it, but I am not alone on the no man-made warming side of this issue. On May 20th, a list of the names of over thirty-one thousand scientists who refute global warming was released. Thirty-one thousand of which 9,000 are Ph.ds. Think about that. Thirty-one thousand. That dwarfs the supposed 2,500 scientists on the UN panel. In the past year, five hundred of scientists have issued public statements challenging global warming. A few more join the chorus every week. There are about 100 defectors from the UN IPCC. There was an International Conference of Climate Change Skeptics in New York in March of this year. One hundred of us gave presentations. Attendance was limited to six hundred people. Every seat was taken. There are a half dozen excellent internet sites that debunk global warming. And, thank goodness for KUSI and Michael McKinnon, its owner. He allows me to post my comments on global warming on the website KUSI.com. Following the publicity of my position form Fox News, Glen Beck on CNN, Rush Limbaugh and a host of other interviews, thousands of people come to the website and read my comments. I get hundreds of supportive emails from them. No I am not alone and the debate is not over.

In my remarks in New York I speculated that perhaps we should sue Al Gore for fraud because of his carbon credits trading scheme. That remark has caused a stir in the fringe media and on the internet. The concept is that if the media won’t give us a hearing and the other side will not debate us, perhaps we could use a Court of law to present our papers and our research and if the Judge is unbiased and understands science, we win. The media couldn’t ignore that. That idea has become the basis for legal research by notable attorneys and discussion among global warming debunkers, but it’s a long way from the Court room.

I am very serious about this issue. I think stamping out the global warming scam is vital to saving our wonderful way of life.

The battle against fossil fuels has controlled policy in this country for decades. It was the environmentalist’s prime force in blocking any drilling for oil in this country and the blocking the building of any new refineries, as well. So now the shortage they created has sent gasoline prices soaring. And, it has lead to the folly of ethanol, which is also partly behind the fuel price increases; that and our restricted oil policy. The ethanol folly is also creating a food crisis throughput the world – it is behind the food price rises for all the grains, for cereals, bread, everything that relies on corn or soy or wheat, including animals that are fed corn, most processed foods that use corn oil or soybean oil or corn syrup. Food shortages or high costs have led to food riots in some third world countries and made the cost of eating out or at home budget busting for many.

So now the global warming myth actually has lead to the chaos we are now enduring with energy and food prices. We pay for it every time we fill our gas tanks. Not only is it running up gasoline prices, it has changed government policy impacting our taxes, our utility bills and the entire focus of government funding. And, now the Congress is considering a cap and trade carbon credits policy. We the citizens will pay for that, too. It all ends up in our taxes and the price of goods and services.

So the Global warming frenzy is, indeed, threatening our civilization. Not because global warming is real; it is not. But because of the all the horrible side effects of the global warming scam.

I love this civilization. I want to do my part to protect it.

If Al Gore and his global warming scare dictates the future policy of our governments, the current economic downturn could indeed become a recession, drift into a depression and our modern civilization could fall into an abyss. And it would largely be a direct result of the global warming frenzy.


My mission, in what is left of a long and exciting lifetime, is to stamp out this Global Warming silliness and let all of us get on with enjoying our lives and loving our planet, Earth.